Australians In Egypt

The Suez Canal and Egypt were strategically vital during World War I (1914–1918) for both the Allies and the Central Powers due to their geopolitical and economic significance. Below is an outline of their importance to each side & key events:

 

Importance to the Allies

​

Lifeline of the British Empire

The Suez Canal, controlled by Britain, was a critical artery for maintaining communication and trade between Britain and its colonies, especially India, Australia, and New Zealand.

It facilitated the rapid movement of troops, supplies, and resources from the British Empire's eastern territories to the Western Front and other theatres.

About 40% of Britain's oil supplies from the Middle East passed through the canal, essential for fuelling naval and military operations.

Economic and Trade Significance

The canal was a global trade chokepoint, handling a significant portion of maritime commerce. Protecting it ensured the Allies' economic stability.

Disruption of canal traffic would have crippled Britain's ability to sustain its war effort and global influence.

Defence of Egypt

Egypt, a British protectorate since 1914, served as a major base for Allied operations in the Middle East, including campaigns against the Ottoman Empire in Palestine and Mesopotamia.

The defence of Egypt and the canal prevented the Central Powers from cutting off Allied supply lines and threatening British dominance in the region.

Military Staging Ground

Egypt hosted large Allied garrisons, training camps, and logistics hubs. It was the launchpad for the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915–1918), which aimed to secure the canal and push back Ottoman forces.

 

Importance to the Central Powers

​​

Disrupting Allied Supply Lines

The Central Powers, particularly the Ottoman Empire (supported by Germany), aimed to seize or disrupt the Suez Canal to sever Britain's link to its eastern colonies.

A successful attack on the canal would have delayed or prevented the deployment of Indian and ANZAC troops to Europe and the Middle East, weakening the Allied war effort.

Ottoman Strategic Objectives

The Ottoman Empire sought to reclaim Egypt, nominally under Ottoman suzerainty but effectively a British protectorate, to restore regional influence and rally Arab support.

The Ottoman-German offensive against the canal in 1915 (First Suez Offensive) aimed to incite an Egyptian uprising against British rule, though it failed due to logistical challenges and strong Allied defences.

German Influence and Subversion:

Germany supported Ottoman efforts to attack the canal as part of its broader strategy to destabilize British and French colonial empires.

German agents fomented unrest in Egypt and the broader Middle East to divert Allied resources from the Western Front.

Propaganda and Morale

Capturing the canal would have been a significant propaganda victory for the Central Powers, demonstrating their ability to challenge British naval and imperial dominance. This could have caused nations weighing up who to support to join them rather than the Allies

 

Key Events and Outcomes

​

Orgnaising and Training

Following the outbreak of World War I, Egypt became a critical base for the British Empire. Australian and New Zealand troops—collectively forming the ANZAC—were stationed and trained near Cairo in preparation for campaigns in the Middle East and Europe.

Battle of the Wazza (April 2, 1915)

In a notorious incident known as the Battle of the Wazza (or Wazzir Riot), 2,000–3,000 ANZAC troops rioted in Cairo’s red-light district. The event reflected both tensions within the ranks and the growing camaraderie between Australian and New Zealand soldiers. Though initially a disciplinary crisis, it later became mythologised as part of the ANZAC legacy.

​

First Suez Offensive (January–February 1915)
Ottoman forces, supported by German officers, attempted to seize the canal. Despite determined efforts, they were repelled by British and Commonwealth troops stationed in Egypt.

​

Gallipoli Campaign (April 1915 – January 1916)

The ANZACs’ first major test came at Gallipoli, launched from their Egyptian staging ground. The failed campaign resulted in high casualties but forged a shared identity among the Australian and New Zealand troops, reinforcing the strategic importance of Egypt as a base.

​

Second Suez Offensive (1916)
A smaller attempt was made to strike the canal again, but it too failed, cementing Allied control of this vital waterway.

​

Allied Counteroffensives

The British-led Egyptian Expeditionary Force launched the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1916–1918), securing the canal and advancing into Ottoman territory, culminating in victories like the capture of Jerusalem (1917).

​

Impact on the War

Allied control of the Suez Canal ensured uninterrupted supply lines, enabling the mobilization of millions of troops and vast resources from the British Empire.

The Central Powers' failure to disrupt the canal limited their ability to challenge Allied dominance in the Middle East and prolonged their strategic isolation.

 

Conclusion

​

The Suez Canal and Egypt were pivotal to the Allied war effort, serving as the backbone of British imperial logistics and a defensive bulwark against Ottoman ambitions. For the Central Powers, capturing the canal was a high priority but ultimately unattainable goal that could have shifted the war's balance. The Allies' successful defence of the canal ensured their strategic and economic advantage, while the Central Powers' failures underscored their logistical and military limitations in the region.